| Message |
Don't know what to tell you. You might be walking over the line a little bit talking about turbos and whether or not listing their top potential is the right thing to do or not. Especially since you offer competitor turbos and you're flat wrong in this case. I find that slightly hypocritical given what other vendors list their carbon-copy turbos at. If people can get that power out of them, they list them as such. There's always a "your results may not be identical" that goes with every mod you buy and most vendors are smart to put a slightly lower number on the rating. I, personally, think they'll do over 500RWHP with ease and I'd have no problem rating them as such despite JWTs always conservative numbering scheme. The two cars that come to mind here are of course Seb's with lower boost than normal and still making 52XRWHP and Rob Scholer's car which made 495RWHP on a conservative tune at JWT for track use. There's another I think that I might be missing. Maybe Seb can fill me in. Just like the PE1420s, I go with what I see. I do believe you call it as you see it, but for the life of me I don't understand why on average people are putting down so much less on the East. Or maybe it just seems that way. You can understand my position I'd hope. I sometimes come across unclear.
My 300Zs: www.zheaven.com - Have a question about either of my 300ZXs? Answers lie within.
Admin: www.350ZForum.com - Your source for the lastest info on the new Nissan 350Z!
Writer: www.SportZMagazine.com - Nothing but Z cars from cover to cover! Subscribe today!
Moderator: www.TwinTurbo.net - Hands down, the best site for 90-96 Z car info and discussion! |
 |
